That's the fatal part of the argument It's not like I'm personally emailing his patient list telling them to drop him as a provider It's saying that having the information *available online* is unethical and harmful
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and
It's saying that if they Google his name and find his blog and read his own words as he posted them for consumption by the public, this will harm his reputation That they're too dumb/ignorant/crazy/brainwashed by wokeness to make that decision, they must be protected from it
2 replies 4 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and
It is astonishingly condescending and hypocritically self-serving It's a disqualifying position in and of itself
1 reply 2 retweets 55 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and
If you prefer to write pseudononymously you should have that option. Is that seriously the point being debated here?
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @arthur_affect and
If the argument is "the media has the right to publicly identify anybody who writes anonymously, anybody who doesn't want to be identified just fears accountability," then what are we even doing here?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @arthur_affect and
If you want to write pseudonymously because you don't want your Black patients, to whom you have a duty of care, finding out you think they're genetically inferior, then yes your name should be published.
1 reply 3 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @HickeyWriter @GabrielObray and
If you want to write pseudonymously because you want to break patient confidentiality and write about things they've told you about their most intimate private lives, for an audience of fascists, then yes your name should be published.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @HickeyWriter @GabrielObray and
it is also not really defensible to use your real name for things you want to take public credit for, expect complete discretion around things you don't want public credit for outside your subculture.. but also take credit for all those things within your subculture
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @georgetakesajob @HickeyWriter and
it's part of this strange commitment to victimization as an identity, where Alexander and friends are just curious nerds constantly mistreated by higher-status people with better social skills, who they are incapable of harming by definition so any outsider critiquing them...
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @georgetakesajob @HickeyWriter and
...must be irrational or cruel. So un-consequentialist, so unwilling to update their priors, so oblivious to the fact that any person with detailed opinions on their subculture is clearly also a giant nerd
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes
The funny thing about r/sneerclub, as frequently commented on by Sneerclubbers, is unlike other "anti- subs" on Reddit, the anti-rationalists are almost all former members of that same community, or adjacent to it No one else cares enough
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @georgetakesajob and
That feels like the same way that a lot of detrans TERFs are the result of TERFs working to exploit the fact that detransitioners care in order to radicalise them
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @georgetakesajob and
The only other time I've seen it was the anti-Shakesville community, which got *really* unfairly tarred as an anti-feminist community when they were actually a group of ex-Shakers who often felt McEwan had manipulated and abused them.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.