Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
arthur_affect's profile
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Verified account
@arthur_affect

Tweets

Arthur ChuVerified account

@arthur_affect

Mad genius, comedian, actor, and freelance voiceover artist broadcasting from the distant shores of Lake Erie (he/him)

Broadview Heights, Ohio
arthur-chu.com
Joined August 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. This Tweet is unavailable.
    2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @mssilverstein @NotoriousAapje and

      Right, the indefensible part of the argument isn't arguing whether or not Scott is racist, or whether or not him being racist impacts his ability to provide mental health care It's the part where SCOTT'S PATIENTS CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO MAKE THAT ASSESSMENT THEMSELVES

      2 replies 9 retweets 70 likes
    3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and

      That's the fatal part of the argument It's not like I'm personally emailing his patient list telling them to drop him as a provider It's saying that having the information *available online* is unethical and harmful

      1 reply 4 retweets 54 likes
    4. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and

      It's saying that if they Google his name and find his blog and read his own words as he posted them for consumption by the public, this will harm his reputation That they're too dumb/ignorant/crazy/brainwashed by wokeness to make that decision, they must be protected from it

      2 replies 4 retweets 63 likes
    5. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and

      It is astonishingly condescending and hypocritically self-serving It's a disqualifying position in and of itself

      1 reply 2 retweets 55 likes
    6. Gabriel Obray‏ @GabrielObray Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @mssilverstein and

      If you prefer to write pseudononymously you should have that option. Is that seriously the point being debated here?

      5 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Gabriel Obray‏ @GabrielObray Feb 16
      Replying to @GabrielObray @arthur_affect and

      If the argument is "the media has the right to publicly identify anybody who writes anonymously, anybody who doesn't want to be identified just fears accountability," then what are we even doing here?

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. David Gerard  🐍 👑  🌷‏ @davidgerard Feb 16
      Replying to @GabrielObray @arthur_affect and

      do you realise how fucking little effort he actually put in, and that he got his friends to vanish his surname from their blogs just days before he posted his "I AM BEING SILENCED!!!!" post

      1 reply 2 retweets 35 likes
    9. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @davidgerard @GabrielObray and

      You are a black and white thinker and have exactly the kind of attitude that I reject: that Scott was fair game because his OPSEC wasn't perfect. Also, do you have evidence for your claim?

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @davidgerard and

      If his name was such a big secret then why have I, someone who has never been within 100 miles of him irl and openly despises him and most of the people he knows, known it since 2014

      3 replies 2 retweets 39 likes
      Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      Anyway this, itself, is black and white thinking, absurdly so Extrapolated even a little way out it makes the concept of journalism impossible - "You're NOT ALLOWED to say things about me I don't want said"

      3:22 PM - 16 Feb 2021
      • 2 Retweets
      • 27 Likes
      • Horrible Checkers Lad Appreciator Hoydenne Aster, internet archaeologist Black Trans Lives Matter ian morris TrueMetis David Gerard 🐍👑 🌷 Belen Targaryen-Baratheon Garlax, The Weasel King
      3 replies 2 retweets 27 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

          Talking about things people don't want talked about is a delicate matter Doing it for its own sake is, sure, just being a jerk But there obviously exists a countervailing ethical pressure where you have to ask "How many people would be upset to know they were ignorant of this"

          1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes
        3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

          It's normally no one else's business if someone cheats on their spouse, but if that person is famous, if they're a church pastor, if they write self-help books about relationships, if they get praised as a "role model" Then it starts being other people's business

          1 reply 1 retweet 37 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @davidgerard and

          Straw man. The claim was never that journalists had to publish what Scott wanted. Just this one piece of irrelevant information.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. eggynack‏ @eggynack Feb 16
          Replying to @NotoriousAapje @arthur_affect and

          Okay, so, defend the idea that this claim doesn't generalize. What precisely makes sharing this information unethical where sharing other information is ethical?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Kelly Kinkade‏ @AB9RF Feb 17
          Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

          This whole argument reminds me of the (slightly bizarre) rule at Wikipedia that it's a community violation to publicly acknowledge (on or off site) a Wikipedian's off-site identity if that Wikipedian doesn't want it acknowledged, *even if it is widely known*.

          2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes
        3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
          Replying to @AB9RF @NotoriousAapje and

          I've been talking all day about how absurdly self-serving online communities are about this shit The story of u/violentacrez on Reddit should speak for itself -- "doxing" him was in Reddit's eyes far far worse than him running r/Creepshots

          1 reply 5 retweets 13 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info