Right, the indefensible part of the argument isn't arguing whether or not Scott is racist, or whether or not him being racist impacts his ability to provide mental health care It's the part where SCOTT'S PATIENTS CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO MAKE THAT ASSESSMENT THEMSELVES
-
-
Because you investigated it, and there's a huge difference between "in some randos' blogs" and "in the NYT"
-
I absolutely did not investigate it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anyway this, itself, is black and white thinking, absurdly so Extrapolated even a little way out it makes the concept of journalism impossible - "You're NOT ALLOWED to say things about me I don't want said"
-
Talking about things people don't want talked about is a delicate matter Doing it for its own sake is, sure, just being a jerk But there obviously exists a countervailing ethical pressure where you have to ask "How many people would be upset to know they were ignorant of this"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.