It is fully consistent with APA guidelines to publish anonymized cases. If you have information that he didn't do so, you should report him to APA. But surely you are just a troll.
-
-
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @_amtiskaw and
It's not about whether he committed a formal APA violation, it's about whether his patients might have been offended if they'd known the way he talked about patients on his blog, and if they'd have had a right to know about him doing so before going to him for treatment
3 replies 2 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @_amtiskaw and
The APA standard doesn't require consent or approval, so this is irrelevant. Any patient can read the APA guidelines and is at risk of being published about anonymously by any psychiatrist. If you have an issue with that, you should take it up with APA, not Scott.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @arthur_affect and
I don't think this is true. Lori Leibovich's book went into it a bit. (She's a psychologist who wrote about her patients.)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @espiers @NotoriousAapje and
Scott's vivid description of both his contempt and *envy* of the convicted domestic abuser who'd had more girlfriends than him certainly crossed what most people would consider to be some sort of line, regardless of what the APA thinks
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @espiers and
So do you believe that psychiatrists should be banned from sharing any negative beliefs about certain behaviors or beliefs? Do you believe that anti-racist psychiatrists are in the wrong? Or does this only apply to the 'other?'
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @espiers and
If I ran the APA, sure, I'm a ban-happy Stalinist as we all know But I don't and I wasn't really advocating that Just, you know, the "free marketplace of ideas"
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
The argument I'm making here isn't that Scott is a racist, or even that being a racist makes him a bad psychiatrist I'm saying at the very least, HIS PATIENTS GET TO MAKE THAT DECISION
2 replies 2 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @espiers and
According to Scott, the consensus in his field is that it's better for patients if they go in without prejudices and the like, because psychiatrists (should) act professionally during their job. I don't trust your judgment on this over those with expertise. 1/2
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @espiers and
Cool Then the standard in the field is psychiatrists shouldn't have popular blogs about controversial issues, he violated that standard, and by his own logic he actually does deserve to be fired
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
You keep missing the part where anyone else in the world is under any moral obligation to help Scott lead his exciting risky double life
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
I mean, according to Scott's fans his blog is of immeasurable value to the intellectual quality of online political conversation, and he's an excellent, empathetic, humane psychiatrist at the top of his field, and to lose either one would be a crime against humanity
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
But, like, I also read his blog and I think their assessment of the former is laughably false, and therefore don't see why I should take seriously their assessment of the latter either Especially when they have no way to fucking know
0 replies 1 retweet 14 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.