I'm arguing for a pretty simple moral rule: if you do something that causes harm and/or goes against someones desires, make sure there is a benefit that outweighs that. I object to the amorality of not doing so. 1/2
-
-
it's also not true in general. Psych professionals are certainly allowed to blog, and many of them do. Under their real names even!
-
Recently-working journalist here. Generally the rule of thumb is you ask yourself whether there's any particular reason to keep a source anonymous. In the case of SSC the guy wasn't particularly anonymous. /1
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.