No, Scott went part-way, the NYT intended to go all the way. Works fine.
-
-
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @erikcorry
So the victim would have half-raped herself? Still not working for you, dude.
1 reply 0 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @espiers @erikcorry
Scott never published his real name on his blog, he merely made it possible to find it with some sleuthing. Lots of SSC readers never knew his name, because they didn't do so. The ability to find his name with sleuthing was never Scott's concern. 1/3
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
His main concern was that patients could find his real name and his secondary concern was that crazy people could easily find it. 2/3
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
now, why would scott alexander siskind not want his patients to find that he used their cases for general entertainment of his blog readers? that's somewhat a mystery to my, but perhaps you have some insight here…
2 replies 1 retweet 69 likes -
It is fully consistent with APA guidelines to publish anonymized cases. If you have information that he didn't do so, you should report him to APA. But surely you are just a troll.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @_amtiskaw and
It's not about whether he committed a formal APA violation, it's about whether his patients might have been offended if they'd known the way he talked about patients on his blog, and if they'd have had a right to know about him doing so before going to him for treatment
3 replies 2 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
yeah when you put it like this, "do siskind's Black patients have a right to know that he thinks they are genetically inferior" seems like a pretty straightforward question to answer
4 replies 6 retweets 80 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @NotoriousAapje and
Even if you insist on pretending the dogwhistles are completely inaudible and you leave race and gender and so on completely out of it, Scott's general attitude of bemused contempt at irrational dumb normies is very off-putting in a mental health professional
3 replies 2 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @perdricof and
Dogwhistle = code for a straw man. You can then pretend that someone said something different from what they actually said.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Pfft his piece "Kolmogorov Complicity" is this big huge long manifesto describing and defending the practice of dogwhistling
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.