Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
arthur_affect's profile
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Verified account
@arthur_affect

Tweets

Arthur ChuVerified account

@arthur_affect

Mad genius, comedian, actor, and freelance voiceover artist broadcasting from the distant shores of Lake Erie (he/him)

Broadview Heights, Ohio
arthur-chu.com
Joined August 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Elizabeth Spiers‏Verified account @espiers Feb 15
      Replying to @erikcorry

      You'd need an argument TO leave it out, which no one has convincingly made, IMO. I wrote an unbylined blog in 2003 and when the Times covered it, they didn't hesitate to note that I was the person writing it and neither did any other outlet.

      3 replies 0 retweets 44 likes
    2. Elizabeth Spiers‏Verified account @espiers Feb 15
      Replying to @espiers @erikcorry

      I also find the idea that Scott is being victimized ludicrous. His name is public and easily because HE put it out there. If he's so worried about privacy now, he can't blame the journalist. He made himself public.

      3 replies 1 retweet 59 likes
    3. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 15
      Replying to @espiers @erikcorry

      Nice victim blaming: "You wore a revealing dress, can't complain about being raped." At no point did Scott make his real identity easy to find. He didn't make it extremely difficult, but that is not the same. 1/2

      4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Elizabeth Spiers‏Verified account @espiers Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @erikcorry

      For the analogy to work, the victim would have to rape herself. Lotta rationalists appear to be bad at basic logic.

      1 reply 0 retweets 76 likes
    5. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @espiers @erikcorry

      No, Scott went part-way, the NYT intended to go all the way. Works fine.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Elizabeth Spiers‏Verified account @espiers Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @erikcorry

      So the victim would have half-raped herself? Still not working for you, dude.

      1 reply 0 retweets 42 likes
    7. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @espiers @erikcorry

      Scott never published his real name on his blog, he merely made it possible to find it with some sleuthing. Lots of SSC readers never knew his name, because they didn't do so. The ability to find his name with sleuthing was never Scott's concern. 1/3

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @espiers @erikcorry

      His main concern was that patients could find his real name and his secondary concern was that crazy people could easily find it. 2/3

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    9. skaffen-amtiskaw‏ @_amtiskaw Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @espiers @erikcorry

      now, why would scott alexander siskind not want his patients to find that he used their cases for general entertainment of his blog readers? that's somewhat a mystery to my, but perhaps you have some insight here…

      2 replies 1 retweet 69 likes
    10. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @_amtiskaw @espiers @erikcorry

      It is fully consistent with APA guidelines to publish anonymized cases. If you have information that he didn't do so, you should report him to APA. But surely you are just a troll.

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @_amtiskaw and

      It's not about whether he committed a formal APA violation, it's about whether his patients might have been offended if they'd known the way he talked about patients on his blog, and if they'd have had a right to know about him doing so before going to him for treatment

      1:14 PM - 16 Feb 2021
      • 2 Retweets
      • 99 Likes
      • Jean (she/her) Cmdr. Street Kate MacInnis Dominic Cyn Bingo Bango David ☭ Frances Acorn asexual potato
      3 replies 2 retweets 99 likes
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. This Tweet is unavailable.
        3. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Random832‏ @Random832 Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

          I think there's a much more coherent case to be made that he specifically deserved to be doxed, or more generally that NYT can be trusted to decide if doxing someone is in the public interest and other actors cannot, than "when it's based on public information it's not doxing".

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Random832‏ @Random832 Feb 16
          Replying to @Random832 @arthur_affect and

          Doxing is *almost always* based on public information, because the people who do it almost never have access to any non-public information about their targets.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Dr. Samantha Hancox-Li‏ @perdricof Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

          yeah when you put it like this, "do siskind's Black patients have a right to know that he thinks they are genetically inferior" seems like a pretty straightforward question to answer

          4 replies 6 retweets 80 likes
        3. Dr. Samantha Hancox-Li‏ @perdricof Feb 16
          Replying to @perdricof @arthur_affect and

          as with most of these cases, siskind's defenders have a vested interest in framing the debate in terms of the reputational harms of being accused of X, rather than the material harms being X inflicts on others

          1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info