They literally are, the definition of a "free speech space" as Scott has tiresomely laid out at length - his vision of a "walled garden" - is a place where people are safe from "callouts" and experiencing negative social consequences for their expressed beliefs https://twitter.com/weberc2/status/1360747836883816448 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
You're confusing "criticism" with Negative Social Consequences
. Criticism is free speech; defamation and harassment are not.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @weberc2
Ah yes, and the scientifically determined and wholly objective distinction is the former is what Scott does to others and the latter is what others do to Scott
2 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @weberc2
I mean defamation had a clear and specific legal meaning, though it’s case by case. What’s even allegedly defamatory?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mssilverstein @arthur_affect
I'm not talking about legal definitions with respect to "free speech", "harassment", or "defamation", to be perfectly clear.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Right, you're talking about Scott's definitions, based on his <s>hurt feelings</s> impeccable rational analysis
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.