They literally are, the definition of a "free speech space" as Scott has tiresomely laid out at length - his vision of a "walled garden" - is a place where people are safe from "callouts" and experiencing negative social consequences for their expressed beliefs https://twitter.com/weberc2/status/1360747836883816448 …
-
-
I mean defamation had a clear and specific legal meaning, though it’s case by case. What’s even allegedly defamatory?
-
I'm not talking about legal definitions with respect to "free speech", "harassment", or "defamation", to be perfectly clear.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. If Scott is doxxing people or trying to get them fired or otherwise slandering them, then yeah, he's a hypocrite. I don't know Scott well enough to defend him, but it's pretty easy to recognize a hit piece.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Criticism is free speech; defamation and harassment are not.