I'm not sure what an article about sterilization in India has to do with a completely voluntary charity in the UK and US that pays people to get IUDs. Do you draw the same parallel between planned parenthood and Hitler?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @colourmeamused_ @ArsonAtDennys and
It sure seems like you're confused. Your argument is that paying people to get reversible birth control -> forced sterilization. By that logic offering any free birth control -> forced sterilization as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeMeows @colourmeamused_ and
Scott didn't know it was reversible when he made that comment - he said he'd "feel better if it was something more reversible" but when he made the comment he fully accepted OP's framing that it was about "getting snipped"
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
See, we are not talking about the charity itself, we are talking about Scott and what this comment about the charity reveals about Scott You are changing the subject, blatantly
3 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
I'm not sure these people actually know how to read for comprehension, tbf.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @iridienne @arthur_affect and
i guess that depends if they are in the phase ‘eugenics is actually good so what if siskind's an eugenicist’ or the phase ‘siskind's not an eugenicist’
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @_amtiskaw @iridienne and
Scott is obviously pro-eugenics, but clearly distinguishes between types of eugenics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Good, so we're all on the same page
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.