The simple fact that this is the kind of conversation people had on Scott's LJ all the time and he apparently found it pleasant and stimulating is damning all by itself, even without the parts where he actually chimes in "Hey that particular eugenics sounds good, I'm on board"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ArsonAtDennys and
The OP was this, and all I'm seeing is people throwing as much shit against the wall to see what sticks, but it's falling far short.pic.twitter.com/0bNkuqKDY1
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FakeMeows @ArsonAtDennys and
Yeah I know You find nothing at all obviously offensive about the screenshotted LJ comment, you probably think that kind of comment is insightful and interesting and wish you could see more of it in mainstream media Fuck you
2 replies 2 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
Scott has scrubbed this at this point I think but a lot of this dustup started way back in 2014 when
@chrysopoetics got in a back-and-forth convo straight up saying "Can you ban the eugenics talk on here, I find it harmful" and Scott refusing and then getting mad3 replies 2 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
I don't even care at this point what Scott personally thinks The fact that he intentionally provides a "safe space" for people to have lengthy conversations on topics that *should not be safe* is enough reason to condemn him "Ban eugenics? That's banning free speech!"
2 replies 4 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ArsonAtDennys and
The mask drops. Thanks for showing what this is really about.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeMeows @ArsonAtDennys and
There was never any "mask", that's literally what this quote is aboutpic.twitter.com/1viRDlKBkK
1 reply 2 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
Scott's whole definition of "epistemic virtue" was "I will NOT ban Nazis, I will instead ban the people who demand I ban Nazis" And you clearly share it Fine, but you can't therefore call
@ElSandifer's accusation somehow dishonest or false2 replies 2 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
And refusing to ban Nazi's is a reaallyyy great way to make sure your place becomes over-run with such folk, too. Like, you can literally watch this play out on the internet time and time and time again.
1 reply 2 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @Felgraf_Physics @FakeMeows and
Scott even *acknowledged this* when the air around him got too odiferous with overt Nazi stink for him to breathe comfortably But in a way that still made him out to somehow be the victim of the SJWs putting him in this position https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/01/neutral-vs-conservative-the-eternal-struggle/ …
2 replies 3 retweets 30 likes
He never puts two and two together here If you try to run a "witch-hunt-free" community, and suddenly find that your community is overrun by witches as a result, THAT MEANS THE WITCHES WERE ALWAYS REAL THAT IS EVIDENCE THE WITCH HUNTERS WERE RIGHT UPDATE YOUR FUCKING PRIORSpic.twitter.com/vQfToAzuM9
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.