"Respectfully" is a heck of a word to use for the veneer of politeness that's cast over behavior that Conor knows full well causes harassment.https://twitter.com/conor64/status/1361093480278237186?s=21 …
-
Show this thread
-
El Sandifer, Rationality Expert to the Stars Retweeted Conor Friedersdorf
"I wish these weren't the consequences of my actions," sobs noted smart person Conor Friedersdorf while continuing to do the thing.https://twitter.com/conor64/status/1361096442996162561 …
El Sandifer, Rationality Expert to the Stars added,
Conor FriedersdorfVerified account @conor64Replying to @ElSandiferI engage with politeness, not a veneer of it. I sincerely wish everyone on Twitter engaged as I do. In my estimation you've made a false charge on this platform, which is why I flagged it. I keep asking for evidence to substantiate the charge, and you keep changing the subject.4 replies 15 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ElSandifer
If you screenshot the abusive Tweets, which I'm not seeing, I'd eagerly block the people who sent them. Meanwhile, can you substantiate the grave accusation that you leveled with examples, or not?
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @conor64 @ElSandifer
Aster, internet archaeologist Retweeted Arthur Chu
Here you go, he says he likes eugenics right here:https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1276353023782993920?s=20 …
Aster, internet archaeologist added,
2 replies 2 retweets 30 likes -
Aster, internet archaeologist Retweeted RationalWiki
Aster, internet archaeologist added,
RationalWiki @RationalWikithat time Scott Alexander of Slate Star Codex (squid314) donated money to sterilise drug users this man is (still) a doctor (Project Prevention is an absolute trip, btw) https://web.archive.org/web/20131230050925/http://squid314.livejournal.com/338295.html?thread=3053175#t3053175 … pic.twitter.com/ypmwBWksDB2 replies 1 retweet 29 likes -
What's so bad about this exactly?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll leave it to
@colourmeamused_@Mrjjrocks to explain lol (mutuals who follow you)2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ArsonAtDennys @conor64 and
You posted this as if it were terribly damning, so you should probably be the one to explain why paying drug addicts to get on birth control is such a bad thing.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FakeMeows @ArsonAtDennys and
Instant pivot from "He's not a eugenicist!" to "Eugenics is good! Tell me what's so bad about eugenics!"
5 replies 5 retweets 108 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ArsonAtDennys and
The charity in question has nothing to do with eugenics. It's about preventing the suffering of children being born to drug addicts who then lose them to the foster care system. But you're deflecting since the specific accusation in the tweet wasn't about eugenics.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I like how the OP in this screenshot mentions this charity for like two lines, goes on this long unhinged Nazi rant, and Scott's only comment is "That charity sounds good!", and you think this is normal and acceptable
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
We're talking about eugenics because the OP *described the charity as practicing eugenics*, and then goes on this huge rant about all the incredibly invasive eugenics they'd practice if they were in charge (making sure people are the exact right amount of autistic etc)
1 reply 4 retweets 44 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FakeMeows and
The simple fact that this is the kind of conversation people had on Scott's LJ all the time and he apparently found it pleasant and stimulating is damning all by itself, even without the parts where he actually chimes in "Hey that particular eugenics sounds good, I'm on board"
1 reply 4 retweets 35 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.