If a bigot loses a job, justice (ie lives of poor/marginalized) is unaffected. If public pressure promotes such actions, justice remains unaffected Given history & nature of US sys racism, if racial justice is seen as partisan, Dem > Rep, social justice is affected, negatively.
-
-
Replying to @findfredhampton @0youngbs and
But "justice" apparently IS affected if a bigot KEEPS their job, right? YOU apparently think so, otherwise you wouldn't be burrowing so hard down this rabbit hole to nowhere. (this is also bullshit because the bigot losing the job would ease up on the marginalized AROUND them.)
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @0youngbs and
Bipartisan, superficially race-neutral policies undergird systemic racism. Not the opinions/tweets of individuals You may have little regard for principles of free speech and due process. But the inevitable backlash to this liberal thoughtlessness will have you rethinking things
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @0youngbs and
Um...getting rid of bigots in the workplace is not "superficial". It's actual concrete action. (Superficial race-neutral" politics would be praising themselves for diversity...while letting the bigotry continue unabated. Dude you can't even get your cliches right.)
1 reply 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @findfredhampton and
Speaking of which if you're so "concerned" about the"the principals of free speech" in regards to "systematic racism" then maybe spend more time speaking out against this, then whether two-bit entertainers lose their jobs because of hateful shit they say.https://www.wonkette.com/state-lawmakers-out-to-cancel-culture-1619-project-in-schools …
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @0youngbs and
The left historians who are critical of 1619 (James McPherson and others) are right in their criticisms of 1619. What's unique to 1619 isn't history, it's liberal identity politics ideology. I'm assuming however you insist there are only two sides to 1619?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @2plus2equals7 and
In case you'd like to ride yourself of there-are-only-two-sides brain & learn what's wrong with 1619 from people who did the major work in contextualizing the centrality of slavery to american history:https://www.wsws.org/en/topics/event/1619 …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @0youngbs and
What's *wrong* is that it makes white reactionaries "uncomfortable" and that's the only "right" we actually need to protect at all cost. That it?pic.twitter.com/iS09PTnTl9
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @0youngbs and
Seems like your position requires you to think the only objection anyone could have to cancel culture is pro racism. You truly don't believe there are many people who have sincere free speech and due process concerns?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @2plus2equals7 and
I believe they may be *sincere*, in that the people lack the self-awareness to see how they're fundamentally stupid
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes
Lol and you tried to call the phrase "lawyer brain" a meaningless buzzword and a sign I was too online Here you are literally demanding that "due process" be followed in the matter of someone getting dogpiled on Twitter, or not being hired for a highly competitive showbiz job
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.