The left historians who are critical of 1619 (James McPherson and others) are right in their criticisms of 1619. What's unique to 1619 isn't history, it's liberal identity politics ideology. I'm assuming however you insist there are only two sides to 1619?
-
-
MLK broke his own rule of getting directly involved in electoral politics because he feared the political tendency he felt Barry Goldwater represented so deeply Do you think the Republicans have become more or less openly reactionary since then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FFS they did it on purpose! And then they bragged about it! That's what the Southern Strategy was!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.