And even more weirdly, mistaken a case of a system that is usually unjust for once responding to public pressure towards justice, for an instance of new injustice.
-
-
If a bigot loses a job, justice (ie lives of poor/marginalized) is unaffected. If public pressure promotes such actions, justice remains unaffected Given history & nature of US sys racism, if racial justice is seen as partisan, Dem > Rep, social justice is affected, negatively.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @findfredhampton @0youngbs and
But "justice" apparently IS affected if a bigot KEEPS their job, right? YOU apparently think so, otherwise you wouldn't be burrowing so hard down this rabbit hole to nowhere. (this is also bullshit because the bigot losing the job would ease up on the marginalized AROUND them.)
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @0youngbs and
Bipartisan, superficially race-neutral policies undergird systemic racism. Not the opinions/tweets of individuals You may have little regard for principles of free speech and due process. But the inevitable backlash to this liberal thoughtlessness will have you rethinking things
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @0youngbs and
Um...getting rid of bigots in the workplace is not "superficial". It's actual concrete action. (Superficial race-neutral" politics would be praising themselves for diversity...while letting the bigotry continue unabated. Dude you can't even get your cliches right.)
1 reply 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @findfredhampton and
Speaking of which if you're so "concerned" about the"the principals of free speech" in regards to "systematic racism" then maybe spend more time speaking out against this, then whether two-bit entertainers lose their jobs because of hateful shit they say.https://www.wonkette.com/state-lawmakers-out-to-cancel-culture-1619-project-in-schools …
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @2plus2equals7 @0youngbs and
The left historians who are critical of 1619 (James McPherson and others) are right in their criticisms of 1619. What's unique to 1619 isn't history, it's liberal identity politics ideology. I'm assuming however you insist there are only two sides to 1619?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @2plus2equals7 and
In case you'd like to ride yourself of there-are-only-two-sides brain & learn what's wrong with 1619 from people who did the major work in contextualizing the centrality of slavery to american history:https://www.wsws.org/en/topics/event/1619 …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @findfredhampton @2plus2equals7 and
Get Fred Hampton's name out of your fucking handle
2 replies 1 retweet 30 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @2plus2equals7 and
Oh yeah if Fred Hampton were alive today he'd be cheering on Disney in continuing to fight systemic racism through casting decisions while rallying support for the author of the crime bill.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know what he'd be doing but I'm sure he'd have better things to do than concern trolling *in favor* of the racist white actor getting all upset that she's not in Star Wars anymore
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.