Chestorton's fence is wonderful here, because you can understand the purpose of a religious taboo and they'll dismiss that understanding because "postmodernism". If the understanding doesn't neatly reinforce what they want to do anyway then it "must" be false to them.
-
-
-
The second-order irony of them essentially constructing a new religious taboo *about religious taboos* so as to come to their a-priori conclusion about "the way things should be" is honestly worth studying and I hope someone is doing that, in some anthropoligy dept. somewhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is insane how some of the biggest tradcath accounts on here, who love talking about how scientific knowledge cant be trusted, reposting out-of-context Aquinas quotes, etc. were full-on Dawkins/Hitchens simps just five years ago.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.