It's obvious that today, culturally, managers are both more empowered and more expected to regulate the non work-related conduct of employees than ever before. What do you feel is at stake on this question that leads you to deny it so stridently?
-
-
But you perceive it as bosses becoming more powerful because you perceive all the other firings as natural and normal - indeed, they're invisible to you, you seem to believe a workers' paradise where "people didn't get fired for non-work stuff" ever existed
-
And you refuse to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you think such an obviously stupid thing
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. Unladylike is one of a few things you can't be fired for (since Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins). Employers who don't document their malfeasance can still fire those *individuals* for "no reason" without fear (absent larger pattern). Even retaliation is unreasonably hard to win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.