Evangelicals don't even actually read the Bible They're, and I cannot emphasize this enough as a former evangelical, so fucking stupid
-
-
I mean if we're using history and logic sure but we all know they're not
-
Yeah - I mean, there's also the text itself, versus the narrative.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Although both Luke & Matthew (and Thomas, which isn't canonical) are sourced largely from the Q source, which was *probably* written down earlier than the earliest Pauline authorship. We just don't have an extant copy.
-
Yeah, and Paul would have had to work at least somewhat in the context of people who still remembered Jesus.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, some of them. There are at least three Pauls and all of the really garbage bullshit came out of the last one, “Roman Reactionary Paul.”
-
sure. there's the real Pauline epistles, which are early (along with the book of Acts, which actually predates all the canonical Gospels), and then there's all the pseudo-Pauline epistles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.