Funny how you little shits are all about the principle of "free speech" and "free expression" but what that means is that I have to shut up lest I get someone canceled on Twitter but the Nazis who want to kill me have to be negotiated with and appeased
-
-
'Nazis who want to kill me' How delusional. I never told you to shut up when you falsely used the redacted modern versions of Talmud passages to try to "debunk" the original Babylonian Talmud passages presented. Were the Nazis also not socialist in your alternate reality?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
How is the longer, more complete quote "redacted"
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Cleeeave and
They also slipped in that thing they do where they claim the Nazis were socialists because it was in the name, like how all those "People's Democratic Republics" must be free societies because it's on the box.
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @StorySlug @Cleeeave and
The Nazis literally didn't have "socialist" in their name to start with, they were just the DAP (German Workers' Party) Adding the "National Socialist" was a marketing thing that Hitler himself, who fiercely despised socialism, was uncomfortable with
1 reply 7 retweets 54 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @little_bugmann @StorySlug and
Hitler, the guy in charge, hated the "socialist"-ish side of things and purged the Strasserists in the Night of the Long Knives as soon as he felt he could And the Strasserists were useless fake socialists, precisely because they were racist and nationalist
2 replies 2 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @little_bugmann and
People seem really intent on missing the fact that they were the left wing of the *Nazi party.* It's a relative comparison. Also they were less socialist in any meaningful sense and just anticapitalist.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ComradeGorbash @little_bugmann and
Yes, if you reject the basic principle of universal solidarity among the entire working class against the entire owner class, then you reject the whole definition of "socialism" as Marx saw it
2 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ComradeGorbash and
In order to be on board with the whole Nazi project at all, Strasser could not actually look forward to the genuine "socialist project" of radical liberation and transformation of society
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes
To be a Nazi he had to be on board with Hitler's stupid bullshit about good old traditional villages filled with good old traditional folk with good old traditional values And just calling that "socialism" because he thought the poor would have more money in that world
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ComradeGorbash and
Yeah - I mean, in significant part, given what we see among self-described socialists *now*, we should not assume that their 1920s equivalents had any more consistent of a definition of "socialism."
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.