This assumes that the issue is with some mighty list of races for whom racism is a thing, as opposed to, y'know, racism constituting a specific societal dynamic that doesn't apply so much to white folk.
-
-
Replying to @eggynack @__rowboat__ and
The idea of separate "races" existing in and of themselves as real things (the reification of race) is already conceding the racist POV Race is best understood as an adjective or better yet a verb, not a noun -- it's something done to people ("racialization")
1 reply 3 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
What people "objectively" are doesn't exist, we're all in a "whole big general mish-mash" (to quote Douglas Adams) that could in theory be defined any which way "Racism" is one of the processes by which we try to rank people from "good" to "bad", "normal" to "abnormal"
1 reply 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
Dividing people into categories along the way expedites this process but isn't necessary to it It's a common thing you hear that in Latin America, race is much more commonly construed as a spectrum and not a set of discrete categories Doesn't make them really less racist
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
I.e. instead of asking "Are you white or black?" (the one drop rule) it's assumed most people are somewhere in between, "mestizo", and the big question starts off with just "*How* white are you?" That's still racist, that's still essentially racism
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
Racism is the existence of an "ideal", of there being a "normal" and "abnormal", of there being a "spectrum" with a "good" and a "bad" pole at all There doesn't have to exist a single "truly white" person in the world for racism to exist if "How white are you?" is a thing
1 reply 3 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
So that's how I parse the "Why can't you be racist against white people?" thing It's not about individual *people* being "immune to racism" It's about the idea that racism is always *directional*, not just "different kinds of people don't like each other"
1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
And the *direction* is always the same in our big overarching culture, "whiter is better and less white is worse" -- that's the actual definition of what "white" even means in this context
1 reply 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
People argue that this isn't always true, that you can have different racisms in different contexts, that in one particular case one white guy being hassled by a bunch of Black people for the only white guy around is "just as racist" I think, looking at the world, they're wrong
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @eggynack and
Just like when talking about "homophobia" or "queerphobia" or the anodyne term "discrimination based on sexuality", the idea of "hetphobia" is an obnoxious joke It doesn't exist at any scale big enough to matter
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes
Individual gay people may dislike straight people, even straight people they have power over by being richer or more famous or whatever, and that may cause harm to the straight people But the straight people aren't attacked for being *abnormal* That's what "straight" MEANS"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.