I'll just note that this, also, is rewriting history in the exact same way The center-left Guardian readers who make up the core TERF demographic were never leaders in anything and absolutely were same-sex marriage "skeptics" back when that was the fight
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
Evidence? I remember a conversation (late 2013) trying to work out why people wanted it but no one opposing it.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @arthur_affect and
Equality in marriage relies on recognising that sexuality is innate and sex-specific, & some people, of any sexuality, want to be able to marry. There is a group of people currently denying the existence &/or significance of biological sex, harassing the LGB, & it isn’t “terfs.”
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Emma Harriet Nicholson
Arthur Chu added,
Emma Harriet Nicholson @Baroness_NicholBecause I foresaw (with some justification) that it would lead to degrading the status of women and of girls.This as we now see has happened and is continuing,so my sex are as a binary class in difficult now. https://twitter.com/ItsKateActually/status/1270702271421177858 …1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
What you just said is an obvious falsehood right on the face of it and you can tell because your ally Baroness Nicholson openly disagrees The whole point of "marriage equality" is to REMOVE any language "on the basis of sex" from the legal definition of marriage
2 replies 2 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
Marriage equality is the principle that what two people's "sex" or "sexuality" is is IRRELEVANT to their right to get married Any two consenting adults, of any sex, can get married for any reason they want Nicholson explicitly opposes this because it undermines the sex binary
4 replies 10 retweets 76 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
She is entitled to her religious beliefs. Do you disagree?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @arthur_affect and
Which religious belief is at stake here, anyway?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mssilverstein @arthur_affect and
I’m assuming she adheres to the claim that marriage is between 1 man & 1 woman, or that it is for the purpose of children. Don’t know, I’m just assuming.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
"I'm not a bigot, I just think bigots are 'entitled' to their bigoted beliefs, all the way up to the point of enacting those beliefs as bigoted policy from the privileged position of a legislator, and never say or do anything to stop them"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.