Right, but the Heritage Foundation and the alt-right suddenly switching to being "allies of vulnerable women" makes perfect sense to you
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
I'll just note that this, also, is rewriting history in the exact same way The center-left Guardian readers who make up the core TERF demographic were never leaders in anything and absolutely were same-sex marriage "skeptics" back when that was the fight
3 replies 3 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
Evidence? I remember a conversation (late 2013) trying to work out why people wanted it but no one opposing it.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @arthur_affect and
Equality in marriage relies on recognising that sexuality is innate and sex-specific, & some people, of any sexuality, want to be able to marry. There is a group of people currently denying the existence &/or significance of biological sex, harassing the LGB, & it isn’t “terfs.”
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Emma Harriet Nicholson
Arthur Chu added,
Emma Harriet Nicholson @Baroness_NicholBecause I foresaw (with some justification) that it would lead to degrading the status of women and of girls.This as we now see has happened and is continuing,so my sex are as a binary class in difficult now. https://twitter.com/ItsKateActually/status/1270702271421177858 …1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
What you just said is an obvious falsehood right on the face of it and you can tell because your ally Baroness Nicholson openly disagrees The whole point of "marriage equality" is to REMOVE any language "on the basis of sex" from the legal definition of marriage
2 replies 2 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
Marriage equality is the principle that what two people's "sex" or "sexuality" is is IRRELEVANT to their right to get married Any two consenting adults, of any sex, can get married for any reason they want Nicholson explicitly opposes this because it undermines the sex binary
4 replies 10 retweets 76 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @twitone and
She is entitled to her religious beliefs. Do you disagree?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @arthur_affect and
I’m sorry you’ve got this unrelenting prick in your timeline.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
She's the one who got bored and decided to start up a year-old thread again mate
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Do you check the date on everything? What an interesting life you lead.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @Shatterface and
I mean, yes, because the date is right there on the tweets, but I also have a functioning long-term memory and a sense of the passage of time and I remember that this thread was a whole year ago
2 replies 2 retweets 24 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.