In case you're wondering Why Someone Doesn't Have a Magazine Contract Anymore, maybe it's because this is what passes for analysis. (Find me one Dem leader who's offended by any of these things.)https://twitter.com/sullydish/status/1346503811821658114 …
-
-
If I'm understanding this correctly, the central policy thing is that the Dems in the house are rewriting their guidelines in some fashion to not use certain gendered words. Which, unless I'm missing something, good?
-
If the previous language was talking mothers and fathers, then that leaves some folks out. Which is bad. The idea that this renders the words themselves bad is silly. They're just underinclusive in certain contexts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.