Your friend started this by trying to define historical transmisogyny out of existence in a patently ridiculous way ("They could all just put on pants and be immune to persecution!") So no, I think we're all the ones who are sick of this shithttps://twitter.com/msediewyatt/status/1343883386285293568 …
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
I haven’t studied historical trans misogyny, I am not a trans woman. I studied women’s studies and I am a woman. Very different. I have no fight with trans people digging up their history, but why do we hear about it constantly when we are trying to advocate for women and girls?
11 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @msediewyatt @arthur_affect
because you are either continuously erasing trans history, refusing to see how all of our histories intertwine OR using women's oppression as a way to be transphobic
1 reply 0 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @robyn_gall @arthur_affect
Ohh gfy. Trans history was only invented yesterday and it’s constantly being used to develop a sick competition with women. And in thinly veiled misogynist rants. All Human history is intertwined. But humans born with vaginas have a specific history, seperate from those not.
12 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @msediewyatt @robyn_gall
Do you know what the origin of the word "bad" in the English language is
3 replies 3 retweets 35 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Whatever people on Tumblr may have made of this fact it's still a pretty fucking stunning fact
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.