I feel there's an analogy between private schools vs adoption, and public schools vs biological parents. Private schools _can_ have much better outcomes, because they can be incredibly selective. Also, some of them exist just to bilk people out of money and end up harming kids.
It doesn't always work, see the infamous Hart case, but the intention is clear It's this tension between two goals - the gatekeeping is to keep people from working the system while the payments themselves are to keep public adoption from only being avaliable to the very rich
-
-
By contrast private adoption, like surrogacy, unambiguously actually is only feasible for the elite (it costs as much in some cases as buying a house)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Family annihilation case in California Went viral because one of the children had been Internet famous for the parents taking him to BLM protests
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.