no but getting the animal dander out of your car so you don't get complaints that could cost you your job isnt.
-
-
Replying to @KidThorazine @arthur_affect and
Uber drivers are *required by their contracts* to take service animals. Stop conveniently ignoring this.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @sarisataka @KidThorazine and
Yeah and the NFB settlement required that the ADA training be separate from the general training, be in the form of a video you have to watch explaining the policy in full, and be retaken multiple times per year to stay on the app
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sarisataka and
It is not ideal - in person training where they can physically verify you were there and agreed to the rules would be ideal - but it is, I think, as extensive training as you can practically implement while still keeping an all-virtual onboarding process
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sarisataka and
In an ideal world they would offer paid training and mentoring positions to the highest rated drivers and have them on-board new drivers with ride alongs and practical assessment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Technicallyowen @arthur_affect and
So a minor aside from me, and I really don’t understand it: Why is everyone trying to get Uber to be a better ethical employer when their stated aim is to fire all the humans and replace them with robots.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @EmJaeCaer @Technicallyowen and
I actually agree with this! Maybe the business model of Uber can’t actually be a completely inclusive space because when you don’t treat your employees like employees you can’t accurately apply guidelines that other actual employees would have
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @surplusvalmeal @EmJaeCaer and
Okay but as long as that's how Uber works then people getting delisted for violating the ADA is still an unambiguously good and positive thing
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @EmJaeCaer and
The logic of "It's bad that this one guy got fired this way because all these other people get away with it" is shitty logic, even if it were true And it isn't true - Uber delists people all the time for this because they have to, they made a specific legal agreement to do so
2 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @EmJaeCaer and
The reason this is an ongoing problem is THERE ARE TOO MANY DRIVERS The churn on app-based rideshare is enormous, it's a selling point - it's how they roll out their service so quickly, anyone with a car can sign up within few days
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes
That's why it's kind of headass to even blame "Uber", the company - this driver who got "fired" likely was able to hop over to Lyft immediately, if he wasn't already The bad policy isn't from corporate, the people get left because the driver population is full of assholes
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @EmJaeCaer and
Yeah why bother to critique a business model that made this a problem to begin with. Definitely focus on the largely undocumented people. Definitely going to solve the problem there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @surplusvalmeal @EmJaeCaer and
It helps the problem in a much more immediate and direct way than concern trolling that redirects the discourse into the driver being the victim does
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.