I hope people realize that this plan to take UK kids off of puberty blockers is almost certainly a direct consequence of the sway that the likes of the fucking wizard billionaire has over politics
-
-
But obviously that's not why she tweets She tweets because she thinks her opinion influences the public Moreover, she tweets to draw attention to her *articles* and *interviews* and *books* that influence the public even more than this platform itself does
-
I really fucking hate this smug butter-wouldn't-melt-in-my-mouth innocence from TERFs You spend all your efforts every minute of every day of every year to work the refs as hard as you can Then when the refs rule in your favor you pretend the refs can't possibly be worked
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For 2 seconds I thought “maybe this outcome, resulting FOR SURE in the suicides of trans kids will make her rethink this” and then I realized I was being an idiot and she almost certainly sees this as a positive
-
Rowling has never been a good person. I never liked her, but I went REALLY off her when she said that she had "no control" of the casting of Johnny Depp.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can't agree. She has the right to an opinion. I think it might be better if people don't conflate the author in question with the recent UK court case because they have no bearing. This was an individual challenging the treatments they received as a child. That's their right.
-
She has the right to her opinion and I have the right to my opinion that her opinion sucks donkey dick "The right to an opinion" is a fucking meaningless, stupid thing to assert or defend
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.