Here is a helpful hint: if people regularly face legal discrimination for their (consensual, adult-human-oriented) sexuality, they belong under the queer umbrella. (a short thread follows) https://twitter.com/dollswhosquirt/status/1332730713871880193 …
-
-
Some people may fail to achieve one of these things, but it takes a true, pink-streaked, procyon rube to fail the hat trick
-
In Canada, for immigration purposes at least, the definition also includes monogamy. "Open marriage" is, we were told in no uncertain terms, invalid according to the Canadian Immigration Bureau.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I admit I've thought about what a more modern, progressive definition of marriage would be Personally I'd be fine with it just being the last C -- having a shared bank account, being responsible for each other's debts But others would say that's very neoliberal of me
-
"Reducing the sacred contract of marriage to just being a special case of starting an S-corporation" *shrug*
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.