Calling someone an ignoramus is not censorship It is an exercise of free speech Especially if, as you seem to now admit, Jordan Peterson *is* in point of fact an ignoramus, in which case it is speaking the truth
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They're allowed to have an emotional reaction to a shitty grifter continuing to get money and fame for his ignorance
1 reply 1 retweet 40 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yup I mean there might be things he isn't ignorant about but I've never heard any
1 reply 1 retweet 40 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Been a while since I did a deep dive into the Constitution but I'm pretty sure it says I'm allowed to call Jordan Peterson an ignoramus
5 replies 3 retweets 65 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, I said I'd never heard of him saying anything non-ignorant I don't feel the need to go watching 200,000 hours of his horseshit on the off chance of finding one either, I have other things to do
3 replies 2 retweets 39 likes
And if "a trend in favor of censorship" means "a lot of people thinking he's an ignoramus who is full of shit", I'm happy to be part of such a "trend" Such "trends" are the inevitable risk one takes when one becomes a public figure who talks and acts like an ignoramus
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.