The stupid "privilege in the past" argument is a standard of debt/social responsibility more or less uniquely applied to trans women It's less common to be able to shift out of a theoretically privileged position post-utero, but if I lose my eyesight tomorrow will I have "debt"?https://twitter.com/maidensblade/status/1329479634954690562 …
-
-
This is why you had that whole situation in the 19th century where people technically were lords and ladies but the farmland and money that went with that was getting steadily stripped away so they were desperate to marry their kids off to commoners who owned shoe factories
-
Cornwall and Lancaster, for their part, are no longer physical duchies that exist as specific geographic locations They're more like a real-estate investment trust that is integrated into and gets special privileges from the state and that can't be sold
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.