Lavery's objection was not to the monetary value of the theft (which, sure, was minimal, just what he needed to survive) It was what he felt was the sheer horrific nature of the physical violation, creeping around people's homes as they slept
-
-
(Cf. Thomas Stockhausen, like two months after 9/11, saying that 9/11 was "the first great work of art in the 21st century" And if you actually parse what he meant by that, then yes, he's correct, but the edgelord way he said it made people very angry and they had a right to be)
-
I always that was an interesting quote in that insofar as aesthetics work (cf. Kant or similar on the nature of The Sublime), it’s far from untrue The fact that he bothered to say it for publicity is the much more unpleasant thing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can see this I’m still on the side of “folk heroes aren’t bad because they do bad things, they don’t even exist as a real referent of rebellion so much as a metaphor for it” On the other hand, you’re right that idolising the Killdozer is hurtful to those it affected
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.