Cytokine storms are not unique to covid and they occur in critically ill patients. Whats your point? They happen with many other, wait for it, *respiratory diseases* including common colds, flu, SARS, MERS, and a host of others. This is *not* indicative of "lifelong sequelae"..
-
-
Replying to @Reroot_Flyover @TheRedRaptor and
Yeah okay what is the percentage of people experiencing cytokine storms from the common cold vs. COVID-19
2 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @TheRedRaptor and
Quit being so absolutist. You dont have all the answers and neither do I. I've proposed multiple solutions that grant individual deference to you and your individual concerns and decision making. Everything from you is "shitstain", "murderer", etc. Good luck changing minds.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reroot_Flyover @TheRedRaptor and
I don't care about my "individual decision making" I mean big fucking whoop, I *always* had the power to make my own decisions Unless Trump were to actually go so far as to ban masks and make a law demanding people eat at restaurants, I always will have that power
4 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Reroot_Flyover and
And that power was fucking useless at actually stopping the plague or protecting anybody when all this started and it hasn't become any more useful in the nine months since
1 reply 1 retweet 36 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Reroot_Flyover and
Fucking useless libertarian platitudes People getting killed in traffic accidents -- "Well, everyone has the power to drive more slowly and carefully" People getting food poisoning from restaurants -- "Well, everyone has the power to only buy from vendors they know and trust"
2 replies 6 retweets 58 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Reroot_Flyover and
And yeah, actually, as far as the Machiavellian political strategy of it all goes, it's very clear that once people like you are allowed at the negotiating table, all will to do what needs to be done is eroded very quickly
2 replies 1 retweet 33 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @TheRedRaptor and
Let's censor. That works! Dissenting voices be damned!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reroot_Flyover @TheRedRaptor and
I'm not censoring you, obviously, but I am opposing you as fiercely as I can with as blunt and uncompromising language as I can, which is not only my right under the First Amendment but what I consider my duty as a citizen
1 reply 2 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @TheRedRaptor and
Amen. But suggesting any debate consist of one side being allowed a voice is exactly as I noted. Censorship. Period.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, it isn't, it's a basic requirement of civil society If you think the Overton Window shouldn't exist or should expand indefinitely then you're asking for something impossible and you're guaranteeing society will never actually progress
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.