I hate the board game with the winner-take-all states so much Every four years some nerd on CNN showing how the numbers swing wildly back and forth if a few thousand votes go one way or another in one state as opposed to just counting all the votes
-
-
I.e. it's a game that would be decided a lot earlier -- total popular vote margins in a national election are rarely all that close -- but to be able to give accurate betting odds you'd have to keep track of everything everywhere on a much more granular level
-
Like a board game where every single thing a player does either nets points or loses points, and the number of such actions is very high, which makes it a much bigger pain in the ass to score and makes it much easier to call a definitive winner early on (so a "bad, boring" game)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.