The ex-girlfriend also beat him up plenty from the start of their relationship. Coleman struck back only on December 27, 2019, when they basically broke up. Accumulated rage, it appears. To put things in perspective, she's around 5" taller than him.
-
-
Weird how you all don't win elections with people like you making posts like this running "special projects"
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ciretose1 @SheldonRanz and
The SDUSA's strategy, such as it is, seems to just be endorsing absolutely every "Berniecrat" in the country who will have them, no matter how shitty they are
2 replies 4 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ciretose1 and
When you openly advertise that you have no standards for your friendship why would anyone want to be your friend What would that be saying to the world about how they see themselves
2 replies 3 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ciretose1 and
I wonder if they’ll seat him. Or, if he goes straight from election to an ethics inquiry.https://www.hutchnews.com/news/20200826/democrats-say-they-will-fight-against-seating-aaron-coleman-if-teen-wins-house-race …
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @greggentry1 @arthur_affect and
This article is several months old. Even the anti-Coleman Kansas City Star warned Democrats not to play games with the seating process lest the Republicans use that against them down the road.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SheldonRanz @greggentry1 and
"If these rules are used to unseat a Democrat, then they might be used in the future to unseat a Democrat." Do you even hear yourself?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @eggynack @greggentry1 and
Take it up with the Kansas City Star. They made that argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SheldonRanz @greggentry1 and
Yeah, and now you're saying it as if it's a reasonable argument. In fact, you positioned the source as extra-reliable due to some bias you perceive in their reporting. So, seems a lot like you're both making that argument.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @eggynack @greggentry1 and
Yes, it seems reasonable. The Star was arguing against interest - it was supporting one argument made by Coleman, which is impressive since it loathes him.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
They were probably on some level trying to get people to vote against him instead of trusting that "the party will take care of it" if he won the election Voter apathy is a really fucking obvious reason he had the "will of the people" while running unopposed against a write-in
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.