It's a mixed bag because if we did split into two or more countries a lot of people in the shittier half would instantly lose any semblance of civil rights That was what was at stake the first time they "suggested" splitting uphttps://twitter.com/benjanun_s/status/1323846771265556480 …
-
Show this thread
-
A lot of people like the edgy take "We should've just let the South leave in 1860, half a million people wouldn't have died and the North could've become a much better country for it" "And the CSA would've had to free the slaves in 20 years for economic reasons anyway"
4 replies 2 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
Yeah well citation fucking needed pal
5 replies 1 retweet 75 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @arthur_affect
“Split into multiple countries that enjoy free immigration and emigration rights” is what they usually mean, which doesn’t fit with the 1860 secession example for the Obvious Reason
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
Yeah well the modern day red states are the ones whose whole identity has become rooted in Building the Wall so I wouldn't have high hopes for free movement in a 21st century balkanized USA
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.