The issue is less about who deserves the credit for winning the war and who paid the COSTS of the war And it obviously rubs people the wrong way to say that the people who suffered least were best placed to make an objective judgment of how to pursue justice
-
-
The point is to give the liberated slaves the forty acres and a mule they were promised, or whatever they actually need to thrive in safety and comfort after the war And since this will, of course, be very expensive, the cost should be taken out of the ass of their oppressors
-
Germany "got off very easy" in multiple senses of the term There's a lot of people who wished they'd suffered more after the war, and they have a strong moral case that I empathize with deeply But in the pragmatic sense, I'm mainly mad at how long it took anyone to get paid
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. It's a matter of redistributing resources back to the people to whom they belong. Have you ever noticed that ONLY white pp ever say 'this is my country' and feel as if this is a perfectly normal statement? It's because they aren't interested in returning stolen items.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.