It doesn't matter if killing civilians is "systematic" or "genocidal" you're still killing civilians! That's my whole argument. Would you have approved of systematically murdering German workers if it would have brought the war to an end?
-
-
Replying to @jlippincott_ @AndrewJensen2 and
I mean, a targeted bombing of a munitions plant kills civilian workers as much as a firebombing of the city does, so what exactly are *you* arguing here
1 reply 2 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @jlippincott_ and
Hell, in the case of Nazi Germany and other regimes happy to rely on forced labor, blowing up a munitions plant would likely mostly kill Jewish workers imported from the camps This is a moral dilemma brought up in Schindler's List etc It's the ugly moral calculus of warfare
1 reply 3 retweets 47 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @jlippincott_ and
Your moral standards would make it basically impossible to wage strategic warfare against a country like Nazi Germany at all It'd limit the warfare of your country to limited wars of "self-defense" on their own territory, which is what the Geneva Conventions were invented for
1 reply 2 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @jlippincott_ and
Which, you know, is all well and good, if you're safe and well-fed and happy in your own country and other people's problems are not your business, like Lucky Lindy openly argued for Not so great if you're a German Jew being systematically genocided
2 replies 3 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @AndrewJensen2 and
Yes, I am arguing for limited war. Every righteous crusade of my lifetime has been bullshit.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jlippincott_ @arthur_affect and
And you know damn well that America didn't fight WW2 to save the Jews. It wasn't even about stopping tyranny either. That's why we cozied up to Stalin.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jlippincott_ @AndrewJensen2 and
Well, yes, the main concern for our leaders was not having Hitler rule half the world as a fascist dictator, which really is bad enough
4 replies 2 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @AndrewJensen2 and
Instead we let Stalin govern from Sakhalin to the Elbe. Before Hitler ever opened a single death camp the Soviets were openly slaughtering kulaks and "wreckers" but he was a "good guy"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
No, he would've let Hitler conquer Europe and burn all the Jews therein and let him stand as a bulwark against Stalin, like all the fucking fascists in America and Britain advocated in the 30s
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @elliotreed and
He holds that position because, of course, he himself is the modern equivalent of a Blackshirt (a MAGA)
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @elliotreed and
I looked that guy up and he wrote a blog for his liberal arts college where he advocates for ignoring COVID and pretending everything is normal on their campus. Because of course he did.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.