If someone tells me their existence is not compatible with something I consider a non-optional dealbreaker— I believe they are describing their understanding of an adverse experience of some kind that they’re having, until proven otherwise, because I have to
-
-
The whole "post-Stonewall" movement was as much an explosion of impatience and frustration with those guys as it was the cops and gay-bashers themselves
-
What we today call "Pride" was a wholesale rejection of that ethos, which is why it's so frustrating seeing people try to blatantly change the narrative around "Pride" to make it sponsor- and family-friendly
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So that’s who I should be telling people they’re confusing me with, that is /way/ after my time,
-
(I think I’ve mentioned but “gay men existing is that thing, intrinsically, they are all gender-and-sexuality traitors” was nigh-ubiquitous in the kind of queer community I stumbled into at Formative Times, before it became the marker of radicalization it can be now)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.