I love how casually you people toss around the word “debate” like the disagreement is over our favorite colors or sandwich spread, as opposed to your hatred of us - sorry, your 'disagreement with our lifestyle choices’ (copyright 1980-1990)
-
-
Replying to @Mishyana @megawhelmed and
My disagreement isn't with lifestyle choices but how that impacts women's and children's safety, privacy and dignity and how people are being coerced into lies.
4 replies 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @eclair_voyance @megawhelmed and
It's amazing that you don't (or won't) see the parallels between what you're saying here and what religious right homophobes were and have been saying for the last half-century. Moral panics, 'recruiting', 'safety of children', "what about the changing rooms/bathrooms", etc.
4 replies 2 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @Mishyana @eclair_voyance and
You're using the *exact same playbook*, just with white out over "homosexual" and "transgender" scribbled in its place.
6 replies 2 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @Mishyana @eclair_voyance and
I'm pretty sure if you showed them the text of Section 28, or paraphrased it in nice-sounding enough terms, and just didn't actually call it "Section 28" they'd all be on board with supporting it
2 replies 0 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Mishyana and
I think you are lying. Spouting BS. Defaming. And I think you absolutely know that.
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @arthur_affect and
Well you think a lot of stupid things. Like all TERFs
3 replies 1 retweet 46 likes -
Replying to @mxanthropology @arthur_affect and
Like all stupid men's rights activists, you are unaware that a high proportion of GC feminists are themselves lesbians or bisexual. Plus supported by many gay male allies and transwomen and transmen. The idea that all these people would have been pro Section 28 is frankly insane!
5 replies 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @mxanthropology and
The founder of the LGB Alliance is on record saying he doesn't want adult gay men talking to straight children because he thinks they'll corrupt them! Jesus Christ
2 replies 8 retweets 100 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
Malcolm Clark Retweeted Malcolm Clark
Arthur, you seem to be referring to me since I’m the only man on the Steering Committee of
@ALLIANCELGB Your claim is entirely untrue. Here’s a thread where I explained my position. I thought you valued your reputation as honest. It would appear not.https://twitter.com/TwisterFilm/status/1220842159508807680 …Malcolm Clark added,
2 replies 3 retweets 18 likes
The original proponents of Section 28, including your beloved Baroness, didn't literally say all gay men were predators either - nobody actually says that in public, not even the worst homophobes It's always acting out of "an abundance of caution"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
You’ve changed your claim to say I “implied” but your original tweet claimed I was “on the record” as saying gay teachers were a danger. I didn’t say that. I said a tiny minority of teachers both straight and gay are predatory of which the vast majority are straight. Why lie?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @TwisterFilm @CarolT52973604 and
Whatever you think the relative size of the danger is, you think it's sufficient to oppose the existence of Gay-Straight Alliance orgs in schools, which is the actual point
2 replies 1 retweet 71 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.