Peers raping children is sadly common yet still abhorrent Arthur. children can’t consent ergo sex without consent = rape This isn’t complicated
-
-
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @Shatterface and
Okay so why am I the rapist and not the one who was raped, I was equally underage
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Didnt suggest you weren’t both Arthur do catch up.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @Shatterface and
Okay wow Does that mean we both go to jail or are we even steven
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
I believe all rapists should be prosecuted don’t you ?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @arthur_affect and
Pretty sure he's arguing that 17 yos who have consensual sex with each other aren't rapists, so your question is beside the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @RayTski @arthur_affect and
No it isn’t I’m asking what the difference to him why he views some what he views as child sex as acceptable and some as not Apparently it seems the only time he thinks it’s bad is if they are related or the child says no.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @arthur_affect and
He's simply arguing the law as it is right now in most industrialized democracies: - 17yos who have sex with other 17yos are not prosecuted - adults who have sex with minors are You're the one who argues that current laws are wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @RayTski @SebastianPott10 and
Like, your argument is that agreeing with current laws makes Arthur a pedophile. I'd say the burden of proof there is on you.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @RayTski @arthur_affect and
In my view he is a child sex offender
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Does it matter that I was only underage because I lived in California and that if I'd lived in the UK I would have been over a year above the age of consent
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @SebastianPott10 and
I think I became three intelligence points stupider reading this argument The whole point of this argument is children can consent *and not consent* and letting them know this fact is EXTREMELY GOOD Arguing in bad faith about *legal* consent is extremely stupid
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ZonkerBrainless @arthur_affect and
the two things are barely related to each other and yet somehow we're supposed to argue about *legal* consent instead of *real life* consent
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.