Okay so if they can't consent then any sex they have is a violation of consent and must be stopped How do you propose we do that
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @sarisataka and
Child protection falls under the purview of social workers. We do not jail children for having sex with each other. If parents or guardians permit their children to have sex they can be prosecuted.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @sarisataka and
Ah, so me and my high school girlfriend wouldn't have gone to prison in your ideal world, just been taken away from our parents, who WOULD have gone to prison Well that's cool I guess
1 reply 1 retweet 41 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sarisataka and
I’m not sure admitting you had sex with an underage girl is quite the trump card you think it is.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Ahaha Jesus Christ you're trying to own me because I DID lose my virginity before I turned 18 (When I was 17) Okay man, you do you
3 replies 1 retweet 38 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Peers raping children is sadly common yet still abhorrent Arthur. children can’t consent ergo sex without consent = rape This isn’t complicated
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @Shatterface and
Okay so why am I the rapist and not the one who was raped, I was equally underage
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Didnt suggest you weren’t both Arthur do catch up.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SebastianPott10 @arthur_affect and
I once thought that laws against sex with people under the age of consent was meant to protect them, not to terrorise them? What did I miss.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
No the terrorizing is for your protection, it's a sign that you take safeguarding truly seriously
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.