It's so, so fucking clear that TERFs are what the UK has instead of the Religious Right and calling yourself "secular" doesn't make a single goddamn lick of difference when it comes to having a reactionary mindset
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @KidThorazine and
Hello Projection. You are the right-wing, regressive misogynists. Your hatred for women and girls shines out of everything you say and do. You've just spent a day trying to undermine child safeguarding. Shame on you.
6 replies 1 retweet 29 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @arthur_affect and
I mean your approach to "child safeguarding" has long been proven to be hopelessly ineffective at best and severely detrimental at worst so I don't really think anything has been undermined here.
1 reply 2 retweets 88 likes -
Replying to @KidThorazine @CarolT52973604 and
"Child safeguarding" is going to be the name they put on the new Section 28 when they pass it, it's like not even subtle at all at this point
1 reply 4 retweets 102 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @KidThorazine and
Attempting to portray child safeguarding as a Bad Thing makes you look like a nonce. Why are you doing this, Arthur? Why have you spent the last 34 hours battling against keeping children safe? Weird hill to choose to die on. Especially publicly.
5 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @KidThorazine and
Section 28 was literally a child safeguarding law, that was the explicit justification for it used by conservatives -- LIKE EMMA NICHOLSON -- to argue for it
3 replies 5 retweets 95 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
Things have deteriorated in the UK so rapidly that the LGB Alliance has within a year gone from "How dare you accuse us of supporting Section 28, that's vile slander to throw at any gay person" to "Yeah actually Section 28 is good"
2 replies 12 retweets 121 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @KidThorazine and
That's really quite stupid slander - don't you know that the LGB Alliance are the main UK organisation for LGB rights? Suggesting they would support Section 28




13 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @KidThorazine and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Grace Petrie
Yes, they literally would, because they're a quisling front org for conservative homophobes and TERFs This is one of their directors in September, straight up saying Stonewall should be banned from schools because they "recruit"https://twitter.com/gracepetrie/status/1303622215028674561?s=20 …
Arthur Chu added,
Grace Petrie @gracepetrieAs so many people have warned and predicted for so long, transphobic activists are making the incredibly short journey from spreading fear and suspicion about trans people to spreading fear and suspicion about gay people. We TOLD you this was going to happen. pic.twitter.com/O4l7kyTEguShow this thread3 replies 4 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @KidThorazine and
Yes, because Stonewall no longer represent the LGB, only the T. You should be aware of this, being a gay man.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
He specifically said he thought it was a problem that Stonewall was encouraging kids to identify as gay
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.