Okay we're still not getting this She did NOT receive information Because the claims in the dossier were false, and there were no WMDs The "information" from her "sources" was blatant fucking lies Occam's Razor says she made it up, or was aware her "source" made it up
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
It is the year 2020 and people are out here saying that the "bad intel" about Saddam's WMDs was somehow a big plausible misunderstanding and none of the salesmen of the war did anything shady Good fucking Lord
3 replies 8 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
Oh but you see the person who lied to start a war that primarily killed civilians also hates trans people, so it's ok
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @julie_neuhouser @arthur_affect and
She passed the information she received to the people tasked with analysing such information. Should she have withheld it?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @julie_neuhouser and
The only way out of admitting these people lied is the "We were duped too!" alibi, that there was a very clever and complex conspiracy among Saddam's people to *pretend* to have WMDs and leak the info to the US so we would kill them I do not find this theory plausible
3 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @julie_neuhouser and
But hell even if that were true that just downgrades her from "malicious liar" to "utterly gullible stupid foolish dumb dumb patsy and pawn who didn't in a million years deserve the job she had" It's not that different It's still her fault all those people died
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @julie_neuhouser and
Should she have withheld information that a hostile country was targeting England with WMDs that she had received from what she believed was a credible source for analysis by experts? The recruiters made the final decision. Not the Baroness.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DieMadTerf @julie_neuhouser and
No, she should not have made up that she had such information in order to start a phony war and finally take down Saddam
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @julie_neuhouser and
You know what's the strongest evidence that Nicholson just lied That when it turned out there were no WMDs, she didn't give a shit She was happy She was still crowing about what a great idea the war was in 2013https://www.libdemvoice.org/emma-nicholson-writes-was-the-war-worth-it-a-resounding-yes-from-me-33733.html …
2 replies 6 retweets 21 likes
Much like her American counterparts, the striking thing is how little she cared about the casus belli once the shooting started Everyone just forgot about it and started talking up how great the new Iraq was gonna be regardless of the means we took to get there
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.