We have nothing in common. You have inflicted such damage and harm.
-
-
Replying to @mcashmanCBE @Baroness_Nichol
Why enter British politics if you believe that? Baroness Nicholson is a former director of Save the Children, a former EU parliament's human rights committee member, she chairs an APPG againt human trafficking and she has done much more for charity. Nothing in common, eh?
7 replies 20 retweets 301 likes -
Yeah, but has she been in EastEnders? And, um, well that’s it isn’t it?
1 reply 0 retweets 102 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @megawhelmed and
She dragged the UK into the Iraq War you goddamn fucks
49 replies 3 retweets 206 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @megawhelmed and
Shatterface Retweeted ℜ𝖊𝖓𝖔𝖚𝖓𝖈𝖊𝖗𝕺𝖋𝕷𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑𝖘®
No, but Cashman did.https://twitter.com/IamCassieCurtis/status/1318575916780605443 …
Shatterface added,
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @arthur_affect and
You. Coming here. With your facts. Arthur's not going to like facts
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @Shatterface and
The EU resolution -- all three of the resolutions -- were nonbinding and symbolic, which is why Nicholson skipped all of them (including the antiwar one that went up first) It matters a lot less than personally presenting a lying case for warhttps://www.politico.eu/article/mep-hands-blix-dossier-on-sites-linked-to-weapons-development/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
Should she have withheld information she received? Handing information over for analysis by experts =\= singlehandedly dragging the UK into war. Making shit up makes you singlehandedly responsible for your own blockheadedness though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DieMadTerf @MFnP and
Okay see the issue is that the information was lies, because the WMDs did not exist I was not aware this was still controversial
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
The Baroness received information and handed it over to the people tasked with analysing such information. Should she have withheld it?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Okay we're still not getting this She did NOT receive information Because the claims in the dossier were false, and there were no WMDs The "information" from her "sources" was blatant fucking lies Occam's Razor says she made it up, or was aware her "source" made it up
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
It is the year 2020 and people are out here saying that the "bad intel" about Saddam's WMDs was somehow a big plausible misunderstanding and none of the salesmen of the war did anything shady Good fucking Lord
3 replies 8 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
Oh but you see the person who lied to start a war that primarily killed civilians also hates trans people, so it's ok
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.