Well I guess it would mean that my high school girlfriend and I raped each other several times when we were 17 and I would rather neither of us go to prison
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @IsobelN17154304 @CarolT52973604 and
No, it is a pretty direct answer to your question If minors can't consent to sex with each other then there's a lot of mutual rapists out there who have to go to prison
2 replies 2 retweets 50 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @IsobelN17154304 @CarolT52973604 and
There's usually legal guidelines put in place for what age gap people think is appropriate, based on the idea that age of consent is a spectrum If it weren't, then a 10-year-old and a 15-year-old couldn't be any "more wrong" than two 15-year-olds
1 reply 2 retweets 33 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @IsobelN17154304 @CarolT52973604 and
That it would logically mean the two 15-year-olds have to go to jail, and that there's no difference between the two 15-year-olds having "consensual" sex and one of them raping the other It's really not that complicated
3 replies 2 retweets 54 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @IsobelN17154304 and
The outrage and anger at teaching "enthusiastic consent" to minors seems to assume that minors just won't ever have sex with each other, and that because they "can't consent" talking to them at all about consent is "obscene" and "grooming" and all that stuff
3 replies 6 retweets 69 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
If the concept of "consent" can't apply to minors then you HAVE NO SAFEGUARDING That's what people keep saying, that it is VITAL in any sexual relationship to distinguish between consent and lack of consent, in every interaction
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.