So in what context is this shit *not* teaching regressive stereotypes - the 1950s?
-
-
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
The training is explicitly about finding different ways to label your gender -- your "masculinity" vs. "femininity", your social role of breadwinner vs. homemaker, your height/weight/muscle mass, your genitals -- and how they don't actually match up with each other or correlate
20 replies 3 retweets 40 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GCDude1 @Shatterface and
Yes, that's the point So is saying "Men are physically strong and women are weak" or "Men's role in reproduction is to fertilize and women's is to gestate"
5 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GCDude1 @Shatterface and
Lol you said that and then *instantly* slipped from clinical biological terms to emotive, "gendered" terms (gestation as "the gift of building life", fast-twitch skeletal muscle fibers as "the gift of strength") Come the fuck on man
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GCDude1 @Shatterface and
What about guys who are physically weak What about women who are infertile
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm pretty sure that, say, Stephen Hawking, at the end of his life, was *exactly as weak* (physically) as a woman sharing his medical condition, he didn't continue to have an automatic Male Strength Modifier
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.