I had no objection to child safeguarding until people like Nicholson redefined it to mean things like "banning same-sex marriage between adults, in order to protect the legal definition of the female sex-class"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
This is a rather blatant lie. Nowhere has the Baroness objected to sane-sex marriage in the current materials. As you well know. She is objecting to 13-year-olds being forced to discuss how to carry out anal sex. Why do you support this? Why do you want to sexualise children??
5 replies 0 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @arthur_affect and
What is the difference between teaching girls about P-in-V sex and anal sex? Both are sexual acts that people do for enjoyment far more often than for other reasons.
2 replies 2 retweets 95 likes -
Replying to @halford_rosie @CarolT52973604 and
It's actually important to teach about these things so they have the knowledge to do it safely when the time comes. No point teaching them about it after the fact. Atleast this way we're teaching them how to do it all safely before any of them pick up harmful practices from porn
3 replies 2 retweets 105 likes -
Replying to @halford_rosie @arthur_affect and
WTF?! I don't want my 13-yearold daughter to have anal sex *safely*, I don't want her to do it at all. She is 13. It's *illegal* for this age group. By your measure, why not teach all 13-year-olds how to inject heroin safely, just in case they fancy doing it one day.
21 replies 0 retweets 79 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @halford_rosie and
I remember when my Catholic dad lost his shit about the idea of schools handing out condoms Very similar energy to what you're displaying right now "It's like saying if kids will commit suicide with knives then we might as well give them a gun to do it reliably and painlessly"
4 replies 6 retweets 161 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
The idea that if I were "inappropriately and prematurely sexualized" this would constitute something similar to death -- going to hell, I suppose, or just being irrevocably corrupted and damaged Really great stuff to grow up with, I highly recommend it
3 replies 3 retweets 123 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
Quite possibly damaged as sex with a 13yr old is rape and you are justifying it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WomanFromAfrica @CarolT52973604 and
So two 13-year-olds who have sex are mutually raping each other?
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @WomanFromAfrica and
Some states have actually tried to articulate that position legally. One state was about to try a 15 year old as spreading child pornography for sexting another 15 year old. I mean, it's stupid, but that's something they would try to say
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
It's not "some states" it's fucking federal law, a teen who uploads a photo of themselves is guilty of "creating and distributing child pornography" There's this article that went around by a woman who got raided by the FBI as an adult in her 20s for a decade-old "CP charge"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.