Any sex ed tool that includes the anus and “objects” but excludes the clitoris is centred on male gratification.
-
-
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
The fuck do you even know about it You read an article in The Sun and you know everything this exercise consists of? Like your oh-so-accurate reporting about Mermaids' "jelly baby" trainings?
4 replies 2 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
These weren’t in The Sun.pic.twitter.com/UaIPZctV0S
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
No, they're out of context photos where you relied on the fact that people would take your editorializing captions as gospel and not watch a tape of the whole training
2 replies 1 retweet 34 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
So in what context is this shit *not* teaching regressive stereotypes - the 1950s?
2 replies 0 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
The training is explicitly about finding different ways to label your gender -- your "masculinity" vs. "femininity", your social role of breadwinner vs. homemaker, your height/weight/muscle mass, your genitals -- and how they don't actually match up with each other or correlate
20 replies 3 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
So teaching that being a “masculine” is to be the “breadwinner” isn’t regressive?
3 replies 1 retweet 40 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
It's a cultural stereotype that exists but is ultimately overturned by self-identification
5 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
*Reinforced* by 'identification' surely? A man dressing as Barbie overturns stereotypes. A man dressing so and thus *claiming* to be a woman reinforces them.
1 reply 2 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @DaytimePubSmell @Shatterface and
Perhaps, but that's no different from stating that someone must be a man because they're over six feet tall, or they have muscular arms and legs, or they have a deep voice, or they have a penis The point of self-ID is all of these are negotiable
4 replies 2 retweets 17 likes
It is a fact that plenty of trans women don't dress as Barbies -- in fact plenty of trans women dress as GI Joes, or as some eclectic mix of the two "styles", or in a way that makes no reference to the masc/femme spectrum at all
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.