Random middle class suburban cishet lady says anal sex not "actual sex", but part of bizarre infinite universe of possible different sex acts no one would ever think to do on their own Seeks to build whole sex ed curriculum on this understanding of the world More at 11
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
Any sex ed tool that includes the anus and “objects” but excludes the clitoris is centred on male gratification.
3 replies 2 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
The fuck do you even know about it You read an article in The Sun and you know everything this exercise consists of? Like your oh-so-accurate reporting about Mermaids' "jelly baby" trainings?
4 replies 2 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
These weren’t in The Sun.pic.twitter.com/UaIPZctV0S
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
No, they're out of context photos where you relied on the fact that people would take your editorializing captions as gospel and not watch a tape of the whole training
2 replies 1 retweet 34 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
So in what context is this shit *not* teaching regressive stereotypes - the 1950s?
2 replies 0 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
The training is explicitly about finding different ways to label your gender -- your "masculinity" vs. "femininity", your social role of breadwinner vs. homemaker, your height/weight/muscle mass, your genitals -- and how they don't actually match up with each other or correlate
20 replies 3 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
So teaching that being a “masculine” is to be the “breadwinner” isn’t regressive?
3 replies 1 retweet 40 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @CarolT52973604 and
It's a cultural stereotype that exists but is ultimately overturned by self-identification
5 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
*Reinforced* by 'identification' surely? A man dressing as Barbie overturns stereotypes. A man dressing so and thus *claiming* to be a woman reinforces them.
1 reply 2 retweets 30 likes
Perhaps, but that's no different from stating that someone must be a man because they're over six feet tall, or they have muscular arms and legs, or they have a deep voice, or they have a penis The point of self-ID is all of these are negotiable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.