Yeah, but has she been in EastEnders? And, um, well that’s it isn’t it?
-
-
Replying to @Shatterface @megawhelmed and
She dragged the UK into the Iraq War you goddamn fucks
49 replies 3 retweets 206 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
That is really bizarre hyperbole and whataboutery. Why are you so keen to prevent her from speaking up on child safeguarding? What is your objection to child safeguarding?
4 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @Shatterface and
I had no objection to child safeguarding until people like Nicholson redefined it to mean things like "banning same-sex marriage between adults, in order to protect the legal definition of the female sex-class"
3 replies 5 retweets 150 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
This is a rather blatant lie. Nowhere has the Baroness objected to sane-sex marriage in the current materials. As you well know. She is objecting to 13-year-olds being forced to discuss how to carry out anal sex. Why do you support this? Why do you want to sexualise children??
5 replies 0 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @Shatterface and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Emma Harriet Nicholson
She was and is an opponent of same-sex marriage and sees it as inherently linked to her mission of "protecting girls and women"https://twitter.com/Baroness_Nichol/status/1270703409931452416 …
Arthur Chu added,
Emma Harriet Nicholson @Baroness_NicholBecause I foresaw (with some justification) that it would lead to degrading the status of women and of girls.This as we now see has happened and is continuing,so my sex are as a binary class in difficult now. https://twitter.com/ItsKateActually/status/1270702271421177858 …2 replies 4 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
I am strongly in favour of same-sex marriage, so that whataboutery won't work on me. Tell us again why you so strongly oppose child safeguarding? Are you a misogynist? What is your interest in removing safeguards?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @Shatterface and
I don't believe right-wing terror propaganda about kids being forced to have sex in classrooms or whatever the Daily Mail is going on about today and I do believe kids have the right to decent, honest and forthright sex education
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CarolT52973604 and
And if you don't smell the spirit of Section 28 behind this moral panic then you're just plain fucking lying, to us or to yourself *Especially* because an outright homophobe like Nicholson is leading the charge
3 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Section 28 was about attacking the safety and rights of gay and lesbian people. You support attacking the safety and rights of women and girls. You are the one whose actions remind one of Section 28.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, by not restricting the freedoms of educators and accusing them of seeking to corrupt and molest the youth I am just like the people who did do those things
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.